OPEN-ACCESS PEER-REVIEWED
1Manju, 2Manvy Chalana, 3Sandeep Kumar, 4Ashwini Manhas, 5Kawal Preet Kaur, 6Shwaita Goyal, 7*Priyanka
1Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Adesh Medical College & Hospital-Shahbad, Haryana 2Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Adesh Medical College & Hospital-Shahbad, Haryana 3Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, World College of Medical Sciences, Jhajjar Haryana 4Professor & Head, Department of Microbiology, Adesh Medical College & Hospital-Shahbad, Haryana
5Ex-Professor, Department of Microbiology Maharaja Agrsen Medical College & Hospital, Agroha, Hisar
6EX-Assistant Professor, MMU, Solan
7Senior-Resident, Department of Microbiology AIIMS, Bathinda India
Abstract
Background: The prevalence of urinary tract infections in diabetic women is higher than in men. Urinary tract infections make it difficult to control blood sugar in diabetic patients, which increases the need for blood sugar monitoring, reduces the quality of life, and imposes significant treatment costs on the patient. Hence; the present study was conducted for analyzing microbiological profile and antibiotic sensitivity pattern among diabetic patients with UTI.
Materials & methods: A total of 100 patients with presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus were enrolled. Complete demographic and clinical details of all the patients was obtained. The presence of bacteria was considered diagnostic indicators for urinary tract infections. The pathogen was identified using urine culture investigation, which was limited to individuals whose urine microscopy revealed infection. All the results were recorded in Microsoft excel sheet and were subjected to statistical analysis using SPSS software.
Results: UTI was seen in 30 percent of the patients. Escherichia coli was the predominant micro-organism found to be present in 56.67 percent of the patients. Klebsiella species, Enterobacter species, Staphylococcus species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was present in
13.33 percent, 13.33 percent, 10 percent and 6.67 percent of the patients respectively. E.coli was mainly susceptible to Cefotaxime, Cefuroxime, Amikacin, ciprofloxacin and meropenem. Similar pattern was recorded for Klebsiella and Enterobacter. Staphylococcus species was susceptible to cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin and Nalidixic acid. Pseudomonas species was susceptible to Cefuroxime.
Conclusion: UTI is found to be affecting significant proportion of type 2 diabetic patients. Hence; adequate knowledge of the microbiological profile and antibiotic sensitivity patterns helps early treatment planning and reducing the morbidity associated with it.
Keywords: Microbiological Profile, Antibiotic sensitivity, Diabetic
References
[1]. Nicolle LE, Friesen D, Harding GK, Roos LL. Hospitalization for acute pyelonephritis in Manitoba, Canada, during the period from 1989 to 1992; impact of diabetes, pregnancy, and aboriginal origin. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;22(6):1051–1056.
[2]. Boroumand MA, Sam L, Abbasi SH, Salarifar M, Kassaian E, Forghani S. Asymptomatic bacteriuria in type 2 Iranian diabetic women: a cross sectional study. BMC Womens Health. 2006;6:4.
[3]. Benfield T, Jensen JS, Nordestgaard BG. Influence of diabetes and hyperglycaemia on infectious disease hospitalisation and outcome. Diabetologia. 2007;50(3):549–554.
[4]. Schmiemann G, Kniehl E, Gebhardt K, et al. The diagnosis of urinary tract infection: a systematic review. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010;107:361–367.
[5]. Lye WC, Chan RKT, Lee EJC, Kumarasinghe G. Urinary tract infections in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Infect. 1992;24:169–174.
[6]. Shah BV, Chawla KP, Acharya VN. Study of urinary tract infection in diabetic subjects. J Assoc Physician India. 1984;82:1037–1040.
[7]. Bilo HJ. Susceptibility to infection in patients with diabetes mellitus. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2006;150(10):533–534.
[8]. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2010;33((Suppl 1)):S62–9. Erratum in: Diabetes Care 2010;33:e57.
[9]. Khan MAB, Hashim MJ, King JK, Govender RD, Mustafa H, Al Kaabi J. Epidemiology of type 2 diabetes-Global Burden of Disease and forecasted trends. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2020;10:107–11.
[10]. Alemu M, Belete MA, Gebreselassie S, Belay A, Gebretsadik D. Bacterial profiles and their associated factors of UTI and detection of extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Gram-negative uropathogens among patients with diabetes mellitus at Dessie Referral Hospital Northeastern Ethiopia. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2020;13:2935–48.
[11]. Kamei J., Yamamoto S. Complicated urinary tract infections with diabetes mellitus. J. Infect. Chemother. 2021;27:1131–1136.
[12]. Dave C.V., Schneeweiss S., Kim D., Fralick M., Tong A., Patorno E. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and the risk of severe urinary tract infections. Ann. Intern. Med. 2019;17:248–256.
[13]. Alkabbani W., Zongo A., Minhas-Sandhu J.K., Eurich D.T., Shah B.R., Alsabbagh W., Gamble J.M. Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and Urinary Tract Infections: A Propensity Scoreematched Population-based Cohort Study. Can. J. Diabetes. 2022;46:392–403.
[14]. Kumar R, Kumar R, Perswani P, Taimur M, Shah A, Shaukat F. Clinical and Microbiological Profile of Urinary Tract Infections in Diabetic versus Non-DiabeticIndividuals. Cureus. 2019;11(8):e5464.
[15]. Jagadeesan S, Tripathi BK, Patel P, Muthathal S. Urinary tract infection and Diabetes Mellitus- Etio-clinical profile and antibiogram: A North Indian perspective. J Family Med Prim Care. 2022;11(5):1902-1906.
[16]. Biswas D, Pawar N, Patro SK, Krishna NS, Parida D, Bhagtana PK. Clinical profile and spectrum of bacteriuria in patients with diabetes: An analytical study. J Family Med Prim Care. 2022;11(6):3190- 3195.
[17]. Eshwarappa M, Dosegowda R, Aprameya IV, Khan MW, Kumar PS, Kempegowda P. Clinico- microbiological profile of urinary tract infection in south India. Indian J Nephrol. 2011;21(1):30- 36.
[18]. Kiranmala K, Johnson R, Savio J, Idiculla J. Microbiologic profile and clinical practices in urinary tract infections in a tertiary care center in Southern India. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8(9):2888-2892.