OPEN-ACCESS PEER-REVIEWED

1K. Senthilkumar, 2A. Vijayalakshmi

Ph. D Scholar, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vels Institute of Science Technology and Advanced Studies, Pallavaram, Chennai 600 117, Tamilnadu, India.

2Professor, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vels Institute of Science Technology and Advanced Studies, Pallavaram, Chennai 600 117, Tamilnadu, India

Download PDF

Abstract

Background/Objectives:

UV radiation causes sunburn and prolonged exposure signs. Sunscreens protect by absorbing, reflecting, and scattering UV rays. Advancements include non-traditional UV filters and botanical compounds. Effective sun protection is crucial. Microbiological protection is essential in cosmetics to prevent damage and infections. This study aimed to identify self-preserving preservative complexes for sun care products, comparing their efficacy to conventional preservatives.

Methods:

MICs of cosmetic ingredients were assessed to identify antimicrobial compounds. Synergy indices were determined using combinations of multifunctional components. Formulations for self-preserving sun care products were evaluated using Preservative Challenge Testing.

Results:

Synergistic combinations, e.g., Sodium grapeseedamidopropyl PG-dimonium chloride phosphate: inulin: tetrasodium glutamate diacetate (ratios 0.65:12.5:25, 0.5:12.5:30, and 1:12.5:30), effectively minimized microbiological challenges, comparable to traditional preservatives.

Conclusions:

This study shows self-preserving sun care solutions can be developed by selecting multifunctional components. These products maintain aesthetics, sensory attributes, and resist microbial attacks like traditional preservatives. Exploring multifunctional components offers a potent alternative, promoting cosmetic-friendly preservation while mitigating risks.

Keywords: Antimicrobial, self-preservation, sun care formulations, conventional preservatives, multifunctional ingredients.

References

[1]. Hidaka H, Horikoshi S, Serpone N, Knowland J. In vitro photochemical damage to DNA, RNA and their bases by an inorganic sunscreen agent on exposure to UVA and UVB radiation. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem.1997;111(3):205-13. doi.:10.1016/S1010-6030(97)00229-3

[2]. Taylor BR. Ultraviolet radiation and the eye: An epidemiologic study. Tr Am Ophth Soc. 1989; 87:802-53.

[3]. Yuan C, Wang X, Tan Y, Yang L, Lin Y, Wu P. Effects of sunscreen on human skin’s ultraviolet radiation tolerance. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2010;9(4):297–301. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2010.00525.x

[4]. DeBuys HV, Levy SB, Murray JC, Madey DL, Pinnell SR. Modern approaches to photoprotection. Dermatol Clin. 2000;18(4):577-90. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8635(05)70208-4

[5]. Pustisek N, Lipozencic J, Ljubojevic S. A review of sunscreens and their adverse reactions. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2005;13(1):28–35.

[6]. Kneifel W, Czech E, and Kopp B. Microbial contamination of medicinal plants – A review. Planta Med. 2002;68(1):5-15. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-20060

[7]. Pushpalatha HB, Pramod K, Sundaram R. Shyam R. Design and development of self-preserving and preservative-free herbal liquid oral formulation. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2015;5(1):54–60. doi: 10.7324/JAPS.2015.54.S9

[8]. Devlieghere F, Loy‐Hendrickx A D, Rademaker M, Pipelers P, Crozier A, Baets BD, et al. the microbial protection of water‐based preservative‐free cosmetic products. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2015;37(6):627-35. doi: 10.1111/ics.12240

[9]. Kabara JJ, Orth DS. Preservative-free and self-preserving cosmetics and drugs: principles and practice. 1st ed. Marcel Dekker; 1997.

[10]. Siegert W. Boosting the antimicrobial efficiency of multifunctional additives by chelating agents. Int J Appl Sci 2014;140:1–6.

[11]. Leistner L. Basic aspects of food preservation by hurdle technology. Int J Food Microbiol. 2000;55(1-3):181–86. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00161-6

[12]. CLSI Reference Method for Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts; Approved Standard – Third Edition. CLSI document M27-A3, Vol.28, No.14 Wayne,PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute & Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That grow aerobically; Approved Standard – Tenth Edition. CLSI document M07-A10, Vol.35, No.2 Wayne,PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2008 & 2015.

[13]. Curry AS, Graf JG, McEwen GN. CTFA microbiology guidelines. 1993.

[14]. Kull FC, Eisman PC, Sylwestrowicz HD, Mayer RL. Mixtures of quaternary ammonium compounds and long-chain fatty acids as antifungal agents. Appl Microbiol. 1961;9(6):538-41. doi: 10.1128/am.9.6.538-541.1961.

[15]. Narayanan M, Sekar P, Pasupathi M, Mukhopadhyay T. Self-preserving personal care products. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2017; 39(3):301-309. doi: 10.1111/ics.12376.

[16]. Anelich LE, Korsten L. Survey of microorganisms associated with spoilage of cosmetic creams manufactured in South Africa. Int J Cosmet Sci.1996;18(1):25–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2494.1996.tb00133.x.

[17]. Campana R, Scesa C, Patrone V, Vittoria E, Baffone W. Microbiological study of cosmetic products during their use by consumers: health risk and efficacy of preservative systems, Lett Appl Microbiol. 2006;43(3): 301–06. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.01952.x.

[18]. Kabara JJ, Swieczkowski DM, Conley AJ, Truant TP. Fatty acids and derivatives as antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother.1972; 2(1):23–8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.2.1.23.

[19]. Bergasson G, Arnfinnsson J, Steingrìmson O, Thormar H. In vitro killing of candida albicans by fatty acids and monoglycerides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001; 45(11):3209–12. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.11.3209-3212.2001.

[20]. Varvaresou A, Papageorgiou S, Tsirivas E, Protopapa E, Kintziou H, Kefala V, et al. Self-preserving cosmetics. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2009; 31(3):163-175. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2494.2009.00492.x

[21]. ISO 11930:2019. Cosmetics-Microbiology Evaluation of the antimicrobial protection of a cosmetic product. 2019.

[22]. Stoffels K.M. Modern and safe antimicrobial stabilization of cosmetic products. Househ. Pers. Care Today. 2012;7:18–21

[23]. Russell A.D. Challenge testing: Principles and practice. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2003;25(3):147–153. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-2494.2003.00179.x.

[24]. Anand S.P., Sati N. Artificial preservatives and their harmful effects: Looking toward nature for safer alternatives. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2013;4(7):2496–2501.

[25]. Geis P.A. Cosmetic microbiology: A practical approach. In: Geis P.A., editor. Cosmetic Microbiology: A Practical Approach. Taylor & Francis; New York, NY, USA: 2006. pp. 163–180

[26]. Halla N, Fernandes IP, Heleno SA, Costa P, Otmani ZB, Boucherit K, et al. Cosmetics preservation: A Review on present strategies. Molecules. 2018;23(7):1571-1612. doi: 10.3390/molecules23071571

[27]. Kabara J.J. Hurdle technology: Are biocides always necessary for product protection? J. Appl. Cosmetol. 1999;17:102–109.

[28]. Stewart S.E., Parker M.D., Amezquita A., Pitt T.L. Microbiological risk assessment for personal care products. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2016;38:634–645. doi: 10.1111/ics.12338